|
In this economy
Many IT functions are under
funded as enterprises drive for
improved productivity
and expense reductions.
Decisions are made on in a
spirit of making do. For
example, if communications
bandwidth is too narrow for
encrypted traffic? Send it in
clear - problem solved, for
now...
It is not hard to understand the logic behind such actions:
making systems work means no
explanations to the boss, no
struggle for extra resources, no
difficult decisions to close
down important services on which
large parts of the organization
depend.
When an organization is in survival mode, resources are
being husbanded and everyone's
working flat out, it takes a
strength and leadership to say
"no, not good enough" to
something that is apparently
working well. It is also
difficult to justify more
spending with no direct effect
on revenues, and to demonstrate
that something that seems
optional is in fact required.
In an audit of the United Nations' 2 billion dollar
logistical system, it was found
that network links were
insecure, no mechanisms existed
to detect security breaches, and
authentication information was
unsafe. In addition, backup
systems were co-located with the
main systems.
A natural disaster or a hacker could have done a great deal
of damage at little risk. With
IT skills and equipment now
widely available even in the
remotest part of the world, the
UN had placed itself at
considerable risk - a risk to
which it was seemingly blind.
Responsibility for security and disaster recovery planning
cannot be abdicated. It is hard
enough for an organization to
recover from a serious security
breach at the best of times.
These are not the best of times.
Argued from the context of
minimizing risk, the value of
doing it right is clear. Make
sure you're equipped to win that
argument.
Read On...
Order Security Manual
Template...
|